History of Economic Thought // Spring 2025
marcio.santetti@emerson.edu
Mercantilism & excessive regulation
Costs:
What system of beliefs/philosophy opposes economic regulations?
Writings on France’s misguided mercantilist policies.
Pierre le Pesant de Boisguilbert (1646–1714)
Money ≠ wealth;
Agriculture;
Regressive tax system.
Pierre le Pesant de Boisguilbert (1646–1714)
Dissertation on the Nature of Wealth, Money and Taxation (1704)
“A country can become prosperous only if exchanges take place according to the natural order of things, in which all activities are as complementary as the works of a watch.” (pp. 30—1)
Pierre le Pesant de Boisguilbert (1646–1714)
Dissertation on the Nature of Wealth, Money and Taxation (1704)
“[…] the fruits of the soil, and principally corn, put every occupation on their feet. Now their production is neither the consequence of chance, nor the free gift of nature. It is the outcome of a continual labour and of expenses paid in money.” (p. 22)
Pierre le Pesant de Boisguilbert (1646–1714)
Dissertation on the Nature of Wealth, Money and Taxation (1704)
Three causes for economic crises:
Excessive taxation on agriculture;
Excessive gains from exchange;
Excessive luxury spending.
Richard Cantillon (1680?—1734)
Less attacks on Mercantilism;
More focused on laying out principles;
An Essay on the Nature of Trade in General (1755).
Richard Cantillon (1680?—1734)
“The land is the source or matter from whence all wealth is produced. The labour of man is the form which produces it: and wealth in itself is nothing but the maintenance, conveniencies and superfluities of life.
Land produces herbage, roots, corn, flax, cotton, hemp, shrubs and timber of several kinds, with divers sorts of fruits, bark and foliage like that of the mulberry-tree for silkworms; it supplies mines and minerals. To all this the labour of man gives the form of wealth.
Rivers and seas supply fish for the food of man, and many other things for his enjoyment. But these seas and rivers belong to the adjacent lands or are common to all, and the labour of man extracts from them the fish and other advantages.” (p. 1)
Richard Cantillon (1680?—1734)
Still one foot on Mercantilism:
“[…] the comparative greatness of States is their reserve Stock above the yearly consumption…And as Gold and Silver can always buy these things, even from the Enemies of the State, Gold and Silver are the true reserve Stock of a State.” (pp. 89-91)
Richard Cantillon (1680?—1734)
A hierarchy of social classes:
Landlords;
Entrepreneurs;
Hired workers.
Richard Cantillon (1680?—1734)
“[I]t may be established that, except for the prince and the property owners, all the inhabitants of a State are dependent. They can be divided into two classes, entre- preneurs and hired workers. The entrepreneurs are on unfixed wages while the others are on fixed wages as long as there is work, although their functions and ranks may be very unequal. The general who has his pay, the courtier his pension and the domestic servant who has wages, all fall into this last class. All the others are entrepreneurs, whether they are set up with capital to conduct their enterprise, or are entrepreneurs of their own labor without capital, and they may be regarded as living under uncertainty; even the beggars and the robbers are entrepreneurs of this class.”(p. 76)
Richard Cantillon (1680?—1734)
“All these entrepreneurs become consumers and customers of each other, the draper of the wine merchant, and vice versa. In a State, they proportion them- selves to the customers or their consumption. If there are too many hat makers in a city or on a street for the number of people who buy hats, the least patronized must go bankrupt. On the other hand, if there are too few, it will be a profitable business, which will encourage new hat makers to open shops, and in this manner, entrepreneurs of all kinds adjust themselves to risks in a state.” (p. 75)
The first school of economic thought
Physio = nature
Cracy = rule, or government by
Building blocks:
Natural law;
Primacy of agriculture.
Historical background
France vs. England
Productivity of agriculture
Tax burden
The founding figure:
François Quesnay (1694—1774)
Working-class background
Louis XV’s physician
Contributor to Diderot and D’Alembert’s Encyclopedia (1751) (see here)
“The wisest man”?
The founding document:
Tableau Économique (1759)
Devoted to the discovery of the principles of Political Economy.
Underlying philosophy:
Natural law;
Individual rights/private property.
A reaction against Mercantilism
Q: How to react to an established economic doctrine?
A: Appealing to a higher power.
A country’s economy as a mutual-interaction system.
Q: What is a country’s source of wealth?
A: Its net product (produit net).
What is it?
What generates it?
The Physiocrats’ fundamental axiom
A hierarchy of activities:
Agriculture = productive
Commerce and manufacturing = sterile
Against arbitrary price-setting.
Quesnay only observed French small-scale manufacturing.
Three sectors:
Proprietary class;
Productive class;
Sterile class (artisans).
An analogy between the operation of the economy and the performance of the human body.
A simplified version:
Policies to encourage the accumulation of capital
Tax reforms;
Free trade.
Two forms:
Unreflective fo the facts of their day
Overshadowed by normative considerations